In our Sofia to Helsinki EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Volvo EX90 Twin Motor by 93 minutes, completing the 2500km route in 31h 50min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 31h 50min (93 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 48min
- Energy: ~408 kWh
- Distance: 2500km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Volvo EX90 Twin Motor |
| Travel time |
31h 50min |
33h 23min |
| Charging time: |
1h 48min |
3h 4min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~450 kWh |
~452 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (10 min, 25% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesco (12 min, 31% → 70%)
-
Stop 4:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (17 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 5:
Wodny Park Warszawianka (29 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Neste (10 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 8:
Neste Niidu (10 min, 16% → 57%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (26 min, 13% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesco (15 min, 15% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
Kaufland Wolkera (16 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 5:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell MOP East (14 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 7:
Wodny Park Warszawianka (31 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 8:
Kaufland (24 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 9:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Circle K Ādaži (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 11:
Reval Auto Audi (16 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 93-minute advantage over Volvo EX90 Twin Motor on this 2500km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 48min vs 3h 4min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~408 kWh vs ~569 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons