In our Helsinki to Vilnius EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 10 minutes, completing the 686km route in 10h 53min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 10h 53min (10 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 37min
- Energy: ~108 kWh
- Distance: 686km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
11h 3min |
10h 53min |
| Charging time: |
46min |
37min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~123 kWh |
~123 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Circle K (11 min, 17% → 49%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Circle K Ādaži (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY (10 min, 11% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (15 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste (14 min, 14% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
Neste (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 3:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (12 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 10-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 686km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 37min vs 46min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~108 kWh vs ~116 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons