In our Helsinki to Zagreb EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 100 minutes, completing the 2022km route in 26h 15min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 26h 15min (100 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 19min
- Energy: ~315 kWh
- Distance: 2022km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
26h 15min |
27h 55min |
| Charging time: |
1h 19min |
3h 2min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~364 kWh |
~366 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 15% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (24 min, 10% → 74%)
-
Stop 3:
Blue City (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Zachód (12 min, 24% → 64%)
-
Stop 5:
Kaufland (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste (14 min, 14% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
Neste (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 3:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (26 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (32 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 5:
Biedronka Fabryczna (14 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 6:
Hotel Górski (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 7:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 8:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 9:
Signalbau (22 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 10:
Mosonmagyaróvár Süd (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 11:
OMV (18 min, 10% → 64%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 100-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 2022km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 19min vs 3h 2min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~315 kWh vs ~319 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons