In our Lisbon to London EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 10 minutes, completing the 2156km route in 22h 37min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 37min (10 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 18min
- Energy: ~352 kWh
- Distance: 2156km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
22h 37min |
22h 47min |
| Charging time: |
1h 18min |
1h 33min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~388 kWh |
~388 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Lisbon (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Cepsa (14 min, 23% → 73%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Briviesca Sur (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Aire de Saint-Léger Est (15 min, 11% → 71%)
-
Stop 5:
Jardiland (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Aire de Bosc-Mesnil (17 min, 10% → 74%)
- Arrival: London
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Lisbon (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Cepsa (10 min, 14% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Area El Canto (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Telleria Industrialdea (16 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Géant Casino (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 5:
Relais de la Ronde (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Aire de Parcé-sur-Sarthe Est (10 min, 30% → 69%)
-
Stop 7:
Aire de Bosc-Mesnil (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
ENGIE Eurotunnel Main Terminal (10 min, 19% → 55%)
- Arrival: London
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 10-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2156km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 18min vs 1h 33min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~352 kWh vs ~396 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons