In our Lisbon to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 17 minutes, completing the 2504km route in 25h 14min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 14min (17 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 32min
- Energy: ~409 kWh
- Distance: 2504km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
25h 14min |
25h 31min |
| Charging time: |
1h 32min |
1h 52min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~451 kWh |
~451 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Lisbon (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Cepsa (14 min, 23% → 73%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Briviesca Sur (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Super-U (14 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Aire de Corbières Sud (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Mercure Beaumanoir (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Ceriale Sud (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 7:
Parcheggio del Cimitero (16 min, 10% → 72%)
- Arrival: Rome
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Lisbon (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Cepsa (10 min, 14% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Area El Canto (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Telleria Industrialdea (22 min, 10% → 81%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Aire de Garonne (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de Lespignan Sud (10 min, 16% → 60%)
-
Stop 6:
Aire de l'Arc (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
Conioli Sud (14 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 8:
Sant'Ilario Sud (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 9:
Arno Ovest (12 min, 10% → 62%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 17-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2504km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 32min vs 1h 52min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~409 kWh vs ~460 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons