In our Lisbon to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 11 minutes, completing the 1717km route in 17h 16min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 16min (11 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 55min
- Energy: ~267 kWh
- Distance: 1717km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
17h 16min |
17h 27min |
| Charging time: |
55min |
1h 3min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~309 kWh |
~310 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Lisbon (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Cepsa, Martín de Yeltes (10 min, 28% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
Area El Canto, Torquemada (11 min, 24% → 69%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Aire de Labenne Est, Labenne (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger N10, Ruffec (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Aire de Service de Fontaine Colette, Saint-Épain (10 min, 28% → 66%)
- Arrival: Paris
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Lisbon (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Cepsa, Martín de Yeltes (10 min, 14% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Area El Canto, Torquemada (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Telleria Industrialdea, Zestoa (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger E.Leclerc Express, Labouheyre (11 min, 15% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger N10, Ruffec (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Aire de Service de Fontaine Colette, Saint-Épain (10 min, 23% → 65%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 11-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1717km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 55min vs 1h 3min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~267 kWh vs ~315 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons