In our Paris to Lisbon EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 9 minutes, completing the 1719km route in 17h 19min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 19min (9 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 56min
- Energy: ~268 kWh
- Distance: 1719km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
17h 19min |
17h 28min |
| Charging time: |
56min |
1h 6min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~309 kWh |
~309 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Aire des Groies (10 min, 28% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire Fontbelleau Paris Bayonne (10 min, 40% → 69%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Telleria Industrialdea (11 min, 21% → 66%)
-
Stop 4:
Parking Calle Miravete (15 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Castelo Branco Oeste (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Lisbon
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Aire des Groies (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de l'Estalot (13 min, 30% → 70%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Telleria Industrialdea (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
Area El Canto (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Cepsa (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Castelo Branco Oeste (10 min, 17% → 60%)
- Arrival: Lisbon
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 9-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1719km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 56min vs 1h 6min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~268 kWh vs ~316 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons