In our Madrid to Paris EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 61 minutes, completing the 1249km route in 12h 54min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 12h 54min (61 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 48min
- Energy: ~224 kWh
- Distance: 1249km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
12h 54min |
13h 55min |
| Charging time: |
48min |
1h 40min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~225 kWh |
~226 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Briviesca Sur (10 min, 40% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger McDonald's (17 min, 11% → 73%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger N10 (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Aire de Service de Fontaine Colette (11 min, 22% → 67%)
- Arrival: Paris
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Briviesca Sur (13 min, 14% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Telleria Industrialdea (14 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger McDonald's (19 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Aire de Bédenac Est (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger N10 (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Decathlon (23 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 61-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1249km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 48min vs 1h 40min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons