In our Milan to Rome EV duel, the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 12 minutes, completing the 577km route in 5h 48min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 4 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 5h 48min (12 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 29min
- Energy: ~92 kWh
- Distance: 577km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
6h 0min |
5h 48min |
| Charging time: |
38min |
29min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~104 kWh |
~104 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Milan (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Hotel Real Fini Baia Del Re (10 min, 41% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Osteria De'Giusti (11 min, 13% → 46%)
-
Stop 3:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest (17 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Rome
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Milan (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Ristorante Goyo (15 min, 12% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest (14 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 achieved a 12-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 577km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 29min vs 38min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~92 kWh vs ~98 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons