In our Munich to Budapest EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 22 minutes, completing the 653km route in 6h 14min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 1 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 6h 14min (22 min faster)
- Charging stops: 1
- Charging time: 10min
- Energy: ~107 kWh
- Distance: 653km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
6h 14min |
6h 36min |
| Charging time: |
10min |
30min |
| Charging stops: |
1 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~118 kWh |
~118 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
HPC Fachmarktzentrum Franz-Schubert-Straße, Schwechat (10 min, 22% → 63%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Electra Stop & Go Pendlerparkplatz Amstetten West, Amstetten (10 min, 21% → 52%)
-
Stop 2:
HPC Fachmarktzentrum Franz-Schubert-Straße, Schwechat (10 min, 11% → 45%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Győr, Ikrény (10 min, 15% → 48%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 22-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 653km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 1 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 10min vs 30min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~107 kWh vs ~108 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons