In our Munich to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 35 minutes, completing the 900km route in 9h 1min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 9h 1min (35 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 21min
- Energy: ~147 kWh
- Distance: 900km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
9h 1min |
9h 36min |
| Charging time: |
21min |
50min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~162 kWh |
~163 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Garda Ovest, Cavaion Veronese (10 min, 28% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Ristorante Goyo, Calenzano (11 min, 17% → 65%)
- Arrival: Rome
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Eni Paganella Ovest, Stazione di Lavis (10 min, 13% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
Electra Old Wild West, San Giorgio Bigarello (16 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
Ristorante Goyo, Calenzano (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest, Fabro (11 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 35-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 900km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 21min vs 50min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~147 kWh vs ~149 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons