In our Rome to Munich EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 28 minutes, completing the 897km route in 9h 2min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 9h 2min (28 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 24min
- Energy: ~146 kWh
- Distance: 897km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
9h 2min |
9h 30min |
| Charging time: |
24min |
51min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~161 kWh |
~162 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Povegliano Est (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 2:
Isarco Est / Eisack Ost (14 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Munich
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Via del Lago (15 min, 13% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Povegliano Est (16 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
Isarco Est / Eisack Ost (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 4:
Al Tornante Panorama Restaurant & Pizzeria (10 min, 12% → 47%)
- Arrival: Munich
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 28-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 897km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 24min vs 51min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~146 kWh vs ~148 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons