In our Munich to Köln EV duel, the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 8 minutes, completing the 555km route in 5h 56min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 4 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 5h 56min (8 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 26min
- Energy: ~88 kWh
- Distance: 555km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
6h 4min |
5h 56min |
| Charging time: |
32min |
26min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~100 kWh |
~100 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Am Kapellenberg, Eibelstadt (10 min, 18% → 45%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle Aschaffenburger Straße, Kleinostheim (11 min, 17% → 47%)
-
Stop 3:
Nentershausen Ost, Nentershausen (11 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Köln
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Euro Hotel, Wertheim (13 min, 12% → 52%)
-
Stop 2:
mblty Bad Camberg Ost, Bad Camberg (13 min, 10% → 51%)
- Arrival: Köln
Why the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 achieved a 8-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 555km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 26min vs 32min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~88 kWh vs ~94 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons