In our Munich to Rome EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 19 minutes, completing the 903km route in 9h 43min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 4 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 9h 43min (19 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 5min
- Energy: ~142 kWh
- Distance: 903km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
10h 2min |
9h 43min |
| Charging time: |
1h 18min |
1h 5min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~163 kWh |
~162 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Werdenfelser Platz, Garmisch-Partenkirchen (10 min, 71% → 81%)
-
Stop 2:
Eni Paganella Ovest, Stazione di Lavis (15 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
Electra Old Wild West, San Giorgio Bigarello (11 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 4:
Cantagallo Ovest, Casalecchio di Reno (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 5:
Ristorante Goyo, Calenzano (10 min, 15% → 43%)
-
Stop 6:
Area Servizio Badia al Pino Ovest, Badia al Pino (12 min, 15% → 49%)
-
Stop 7:
Giove Ovest, Giove (10 min, 10% → 40%)
- Arrival: Rome
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hofer, Schönberg im Stubaital (12 min, 54% → 81%)
-
Stop 2:
Garda Ovest, Cavaion Veronese (25 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 3:
Ristorante Goyo, Calenzano (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest, Fabro (13 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 19-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 903km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 5min vs 1h 18min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~142 kWh vs ~153 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons