In our Munich to Paris EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 16 minutes, completing the 832km route in 8h 37min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 8h 37min (16 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 56min
- Energy: ~131 kWh
- Distance: 832km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
8h 53min |
8h 37min |
| Charging time: |
1h 6min |
56min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~150 kWh |
~148 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
P+M Mitfahrerparkplatz A8 Karlsbad, Karlsruhe (10 min, 11% → 41%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Super U, Bernolsheim (10 min, 12% → 42%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's, Freyming-Merlebach (21 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Aire de Valmy Le Moulin, Valmy (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Aire de Gueux, Gueux (15 min, 15% → 54%)
- Arrival: Paris
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle Karlsruher Straße, Ettlingen (12 min, 14% → 52%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Keskastel Est, Keskastel (21 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Aire de Valmy Le Moulin, Valmy (23 min, 10% → 75%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 16-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 832km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 56min vs 1h 6min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~131 kWh vs ~141 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons