In our Paris to Munich EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 12 minutes, completing the 831km route in 8h 35min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 8h 35min (12 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 54min
- Energy: ~131 kWh
- Distance: 831km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
8h 47min |
8h 35min |
| Charging time: |
1h 3min |
54min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~150 kWh |
~149 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aire de Verdun Saint Nicolas Sud (11 min, 13% → 46%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 3:
Engie Aire de Brumath Ouest (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 4:
P+M Mitfahrerparkplatz A8 Karlsbad (13 min, 12% → 50%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Tankstelle (19 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Munich
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Aire de Valmy Orbeval (10 min, 35% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (17 min, 11% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle Karlsruher Straße (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Tankstelle (15 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Munich
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 12-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 831km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 54min vs 1h 3min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~131 kWh vs ~141 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons