In our Nice to Munich EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 11 minutes, completing the 805km route in 9h 2min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 9h 2min (11 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 51min
- Energy: ~127 kWh
- Distance: 805km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
9h 13min |
9h 2min |
| Charging time: |
1h 0min |
51min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~145 kWh |
~145 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Nice (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Ricarica Dorno Est (16 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Bellinzona Sud (14 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 3:
GoFast McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 4:
Autohaus Pirker (10 min, 20% → 46%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 11% → 43%)
- Arrival: Munich
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Nice (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Ricarica Dorno Est (10 min, 15% → 46%)
-
Stop 2:
Area Servizio Coldrerio Est (15 min, 17% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
GoFast McDonald's (16 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle Autohof Holzgünz (10 min, 10% → 42%)
- Arrival: Munich
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 11-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 805km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 51min vs 1h 0min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~127 kWh vs ~136 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons