In our Munich to Nice EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 11 minutes, completing the 803km route in 9h 0min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 9h 0min (11 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 52min
- Energy: ~127 kWh
- Distance: 803km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
9h 11min |
9h 0min |
| Charging time: |
1h 0min |
52min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~145 kWh |
~145 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
GoFast McDonald's, Zizers (13 min, 14% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Bellinzona Nord, Bellinzona (11 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
Muggiano Ovest, Milano (15 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Area di Servizio Stura Ovest, Belforte Monferrato (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Rinovo Nord, Andora (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Nice
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Munich (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
GoFast McDonald's, Zizers (13 min, 19% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
GOFAST Swissminiatur, Melide (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 3:
Ewiva Dorno Ovest, Dorno (19 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Rinovo Nord, Andora (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Nice
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 11-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 803km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 52min vs 1h 0min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~127 kWh vs ~136 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons