In our Nice to Paris EV duel, the Audi e-tron GT beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 4 minutes, completing the 933km route in 9h 20min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q4 40 e-tron's 416km range doesn't beat the Audi e-tron GT's 389km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Audi e-tron GT needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi e-tron GT
- Total time: 9h 20min (4 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 45min
- Energy: ~209 kWh
- Distance: 933km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
9h 24min |
9h 20min |
| Charging time: |
47min |
45min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~168 kWh |
~167 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Nice (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire De Livron (12 min, 16% → 49%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Aire de Taponas (12 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 3:
Mobilize Lounge Avia (12 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de la Couline (11 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Paris
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Nice (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de Tricastin (14 min, 24% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Aire de Taponas (19 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de Venoy Soleil Levant (12 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi e-tron GT Won
The Audi e-tron GT achieved a 4-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 933km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 45min vs 47min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons