In our Paris to Nice EV duel, the Audi e-tron GT beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 5 minutes, completing the 931km route in 9h 24min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q4 40 e-tron's 416km range doesn't beat the Audi e-tron GT's 389km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Audi e-tron GT needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi e-tron GT
- Total time: 9h 24min (5 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 43min
- Energy: ~208 kWh
- Distance: 931km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
9h 29min |
9h 24min |
| Charging time: |
48min |
43min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~168 kWh |
~168 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de La Ferté, Saint-Ambreuil (11 min, 17% → 48%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Roussillon, Roussillon (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de La Coucourde, La Coucourde (14 min, 15% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de l'Arc, Rousset (13 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Nice
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de La Ferté, Saint-Ambreuil (17 min, 11% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Aire de Portes-lès-Valence Ouest, Portes-lès-Valence (15 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de l'Arc, Rousset (11 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Nice
Why the Audi e-tron GT Won
The Audi e-tron GT achieved a 5-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 931km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 43min vs 48min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons