In our Oslo to Berlin EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 31 minutes, completing the 989km route in 13h 1min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 8, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 13h 1min (31 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 30min
- Energy: ~161 kWh
- Distance: 989km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
13h 1min |
13h 32min |
| Charging time: |
30min |
58min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~178 kWh |
~178 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (10 min, 28% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Væggerløsevej (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
HEM Tankstelle (10 min, 42% → 68%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Importgatan (11 min, 19% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (12 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 4:
Væggerløsevej (10 min, 15% → 48%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Van der Valk Resort Linstow (15 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 31-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 989km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 30min vs 58min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~161 kWh vs ~163 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons