In our Berlin to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 30 minutes, completing the 986km route in 13h 6min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 13h 6min (30 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 22min
- Energy: ~161 kWh
- Distance: 986km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
13h 6min |
13h 36min |
| Charging time: |
22min |
1h 3min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~177 kWh |
~178 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Importgatan (12 min, 13% → 63%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Parkplatz P2 Seehafen (10 min, 33% → 46%)
-
Stop 2:
Burger King (10 min, 20% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Importgatan (12 min, 15% → 54%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Circle K (11 min, 10% → 49%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 30-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 986km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 22min vs 1h 3min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~161 kWh vs ~163 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons