In our Oslo to Paris EV duel, the Audi Q4 40 e-tron beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 24 minutes, completing the 1770km route in 20h 40min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q4 40 e-tron needs only 9 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q4 40 e-tron
- Total time: 20h 40min (24 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 2h 3min
- Energy: ~328 kWh
- Distance: 1770km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
20h 40min |
21h 4min |
| Charging time: |
2h 3min |
2h 27min |
| Charging stops: |
9 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~319 kWh |
~319 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Importgatan (12 min, 32% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Väla Centrum (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Clever Burger King (12 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 4:
OstseeCamp Lübecker Bucht (13 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 5:
KFC (14 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 6:
Tecklenburger Land West (14 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 7:
SWD Ladepark Fährstraße (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Aire de Tignée Nord (16 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 9:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest (18 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Paris
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Importgatan (10 min, 13% → 44%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (10 min, 12% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Väla Centrum (17 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 4:
Clever Burger King (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
bft Willer (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
Selgros Öjendorf (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 7:
Daisy's Diner (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
Shell Tankstelle Teutopark (15 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 9:
SWD Ladepark Fährstraße (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Aire de Tignée Nord (18 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 11:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest (21 min, 10% → 71%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi Q4 40 e-tron Won
The Audi Q4 40 e-tron achieved a 24-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1770km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 3min vs 2h 27min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons