In our Oslo to Prague EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 21 minutes, completing the 1328km route in 17h 35min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 8 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 17h 35min (21 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 39min
- Energy: ~209 kWh
- Distance: 1328km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
17h 56min |
17h 35min |
| Charging time: |
2h 0min |
1h 39min |
| Charging stops: |
10 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~239 kWh |
~239 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Vikingagrillen (13 min, 11% → 48%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (15 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 4:
Clever Nordhøj (10 min, 15% → 43%)
-
Stop 5:
Væggerløsevej (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 6:
HEM Tankstelle (12 min, 18% → 50%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger SB Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 8:
Netto / Getränke Hoffmann (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 9:
Rüblingsheide (12 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 10:
SachsenEnergie City Center (17 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Prague
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Importgatan (15 min, 13% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Væggerløsevej (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Van der Valk Resort Linstow (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 6:
McDonald's TotalEnergies Autohof (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 7:
Rüblingsheide (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 8:
SachsenEnergie City Center (14 min, 10% → 54%)
- Arrival: Prague
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 21-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 1328km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 39min vs 2h 0min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~209 kWh vs ~225 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons