In our Oslo to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 617 minutes, completing the 998km route in 21h 24min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 24min (617 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 49min
- Energy: ~163 kWh
- Distance: 998km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
21h 24min |
31h 41min |
| Charging time: |
49min |
1h 42min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~180 kWh |
~257 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger McDonald's (26 min, 10% → 85%)
-
Stop 2:
Kuršu krogs (23 min, 10% → 31%)
- Arrival: Riga
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Lekhyttans Kök & Kiosk (19 min, 14% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
Tesla Supercharger (13 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
S-market Jomala (21 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
Neste Riviera Masku (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Liikenneasema Kivihovi (14 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 6:
Circle K Järve (14 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Circle K (11 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 617-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 998km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 49min vs 1h 42min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~163 kWh vs ~165 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons