In our Oslo to Riga EV duel, the Audi e-tron GT beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 564 minutes, completing the 1000km route in 22h 17min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi e-tron GT needs only 4 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi e-tron GT
- Total time: 22h 17min (564 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 43min
- Energy: ~224 kWh
- Distance: 1000km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi e-tron GT |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
22h 17min |
31h 41min |
| Charging time: |
1h 43min |
1h 42min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~180 kWh |
~257 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Circle K Västhaga (10 min, 16% → 52%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger McDonald's (43 min, 10% → 95%)
-
Stop 3:
Rimi Lāčplēša iela (20 min, 10% → 30%)
-
Stop 4:
Kuršu krogs (30 min, 10% → 39%)
- Arrival: Riga
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Lekhyttans Kök & Kiosk (19 min, 14% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
Tesla Supercharger (13 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
S-market Jomala (21 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
Neste Riviera Masku (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Liikenneasema Kivihovi (14 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 6:
Circle K Järve (14 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Circle K (11 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi e-tron GT Won
The Audi e-tron GT achieved a 564-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1000km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
Related Comparisons