In our Riga to Oslo EV duel, the Audi e-tron GT beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 579 minutes, completing the 1006km route in 21h 59min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi e-tron GT needs only 4 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi e-tron GT
- Total time: 21h 59min (579 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 22min
- Energy: ~225 kWh
- Distance: 1006km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi e-tron GT |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
21h 59min |
31h 38min |
| Charging time: |
1h 22min |
1h 56min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~181 kWh |
~253 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Rimi Lāčplēša iela (46 min, 52% → 95%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 3:
Allego Dinners (10 min, 14% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's Hagalundsvägen (16 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste Pääsküla (10 min, 15% → 48%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger IKEA (11 min, 14% → 51%)
-
Stop 3:
Rinta-Joupin Autoliike (18 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
VIRTA Schnellladesäule (32 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Circle K (16 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Circle K Västhaga (11 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 7:
Preem Grums (18 min, 10% → 64%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi e-tron GT Won
The Audi e-tron GT achieved a 579-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1006km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 22min vs 1h 56min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons