In our Oslo to Riga EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 597 minutes, completing the 999km route in 21h 44min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 44min (597 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 11min
- Energy: ~183 kWh
- Distance: 999km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
21h 44min |
31h 41min |
| Charging time: |
1h 11min |
1h 42min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~180 kWh |
~257 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Preem Grums (10 min, 60% → 80%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger McDonald's (18 min, 18% → 79%)
-
Stop 3:
Rimi Lāčplēša iela (18 min, 10% → 26%)
-
Stop 4:
Kuršu krogs (25 min, 10% → 33%)
- Arrival: Riga
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Lekhyttans Kök & Kiosk (19 min, 14% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
Tesla Supercharger (13 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
S-market Jomala (21 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
Neste Riviera Masku (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Liikenneasema Kivihovi (14 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 6:
Circle K Järve (14 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Circle K (11 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 597-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 999km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 11min vs 1h 42min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons