In our Riga to Oslo EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 617 minutes, completing the 1000km route in 21h 21min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 21min (617 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 44min
- Energy: ~184 kWh
- Distance: 1000km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
21h 21min |
31h 38min |
| Charging time: |
44min |
1h 56min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~180 kWh |
~253 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Rimi Lāčplēša iela (20 min, 61% → 79%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger McDonald's (14 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's Hagalundsvägen (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste Pääsküla (10 min, 15% → 48%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger IKEA (11 min, 14% → 51%)
-
Stop 3:
Rinta-Joupin Autoliike (18 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
VIRTA Schnellladesäule (32 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Circle K (16 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Circle K Västhaga (11 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 7:
Preem Grums (18 min, 10% → 64%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 617-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1000km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 44min vs 1h 56min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons