In our Oslo to Vilnius EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 22 minutes, completing the 1256km route in 24h 47min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 24h 47min (22 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 5min
- Energy: ~195 kWh
- Distance: 1256km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
24h 47min |
25h 9min |
| Charging time: |
1h 5min |
1h 30min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~226 kWh |
~226 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger McDonald's (17 min, 15% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
Virsi (10 min, 10% → 18%)
-
Stop 3:
Kuršu krogs (28 min, 11% → 36%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Preem Grums (10 min, 60% → 80%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger McDonald's (18 min, 18% → 79%)
-
Stop 3:
Rimi Lāčplēša iela (18 min, 10% → 26%)
-
Stop 4:
Kuršu krogs (34 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY (10 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 22-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1256km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 5min vs 1h 30min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~195 kWh vs ~231 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons