In our Vilnius to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 20 minutes, completing the 1256km route in 24h 54min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 24h 54min (20 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 1h 10min
- Energy: ~195 kWh
- Distance: 1256km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
24h 54min |
25h 14min |
| Charging time: |
1h 10min |
1h 31min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~226 kWh |
~226 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Talsu iela (50 min, 23% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Rastplats Kvarndammen (10 min, 13% → 56%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 59% → 80%)
-
Stop 2:
Talsu iela (57 min, 29% → 80%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger McDonald's (14 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's Hagalundsvägen (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 20-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1256km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 10min vs 1h 31min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~195 kWh vs ~231 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons