In our Oslo to Warsaw EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 60 minutes, completing the 1551km route in 18h 16min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 18h 16min (60 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 50min
- Energy: ~253 kWh
- Distance: 1551km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
| Travel time |
18h 16min |
19h 16min |
| Charging time: |
50min |
1h 44min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~279 kWh |
~280 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (10 min, 17% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Væggerløsevej (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
HEM Tankstelle (10 min, 42% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
Autohaus König (10 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Targowa Górka (10 min, 13% → 60%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Importgatan (12 min, 32% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Väla Centrum (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Clever Burger King (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 4:
HEM Tankstelle (10 min, 14% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger SB Tankstelle (14 min, 12% → 51%)
-
Stop 6:
Aral Tankstelle Friedenstraße (10 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 7:
MOP Rogoziniec (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 8:
MOP Lądek (11 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 9:
IONITY Niesułków (10 min, 10% → 37%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 60-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 1551km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 50min vs 1h 44min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~253 kWh vs ~287 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons