In our Oslo to Zagreb EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron GT by 57 minutes, completing the 2014km route in 23h 5min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 5min (57 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 7min
- Energy: ~329 kWh
- Distance: 2014km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
23h 5min |
24h 2min |
| Charging time: |
1h 7min |
2h 1min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~363 kWh |
~363 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (10 min, 17% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Væggerløsevej (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Recharge Autohof Herzsprung (12 min, 18% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
mblty ROSI'S Autohof (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Max-Plank-Straße (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 6:
Raststation Trieben (12 min, 10% → 63%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Importgatan (13 min, 26% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Väla Centrum (14 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Væggerløsevej (14 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Wittstock (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Autohof Brück (13 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
mblty ROSI'S Autohof (12 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Mercedes-Benz Charging Hub Wernberg Autohof (14 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 8:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 9:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 10:
Raststation Gralla West (11 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 57-minute advantage over Audi e-tron GT on this 2014km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 7min vs 2h 1min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~329 kWh vs ~450 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons