In our Zagreb to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron GT by 54 minutes, completing the 2009km route in 23h 3min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 3min (54 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 4min
- Energy: ~328 kWh
- Distance: 2009km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
23h 3min |
23h 57min |
| Charging time: |
1h 4min |
2h 2min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~362 kWh |
~362 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Donautal Ost (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
E center Egert Unterweißenbacher Weg (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's (12 min, 12% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
A.T.U (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Importgatan (12 min, 12% → 63%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Turmöl Tankstelle (14 min, 13% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Bayerischer Wald Nord (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Bergler Autohof Neuhaus (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
mblty ROSI'S Autohof (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 5:
McDonald's (19 min, 11% → 72%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Van der Valk Resort Linstow (11 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 7:
Burger King (10 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 8:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 9:
McDonald's (14 min, 13% → 61%)
-
Stop 10:
Tradenvägen (14 min, 10% → 59%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 54-minute advantage over Audi e-tron GT on this 2009km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 4min vs 2h 2min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~328 kWh vs ~449 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons