In our Paris to Athens EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 35 minutes, completing the 2867km route in 29h 20min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 29h 20min (35 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 2h 17min
- Energy: ~468 kWh
- Distance: 2867km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
29h 20min |
29h 55min |
| Charging time: |
2h 17min |
2h 29min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~516 kWh |
~516 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Engie Aire de Brumath Ouest (13 min, 12% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
Electra Jimmy's Fun Park (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Eisentratten (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (20 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV A1 (34 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 6:
Makpetrol A1 (26 min, 10% → 77%)
-
Stop 7:
IKEA (17 min, 10% → 74%)
- Arrival: Athens
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Aire de Keskastel Ouest (11 min, 15% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
EnBW HyperNetz (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Eisentratten (16 min, 14% → 74%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (16 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 7:
JP Putevi Srbije (31 min, 18% → 88%)
-
Stop 8:
Makpetrol A1 (20 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 9:
Korinos dir Athen (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 10:
Shell (13 min, 10% → 54%)
- Arrival: Athens
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 35-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2867km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 17min vs 2h 29min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~468 kWh vs ~526 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons