In our Paris to Helsinki EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model X 2023 by 380 minutes, completing the 2481km route in 30h 39min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 9 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 30h 39min (380 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 2h 7min
- Energy: ~455 kWh
- Distance: 2481km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Tesla Model X 2023 |
| Travel time |
30h 39min |
36h 59min |
| Charging time: |
2h 7min |
6h 51min |
| Charging stops: |
9 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~447 kWh |
~458 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aachener Land Süd (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Autohaus Weber (10 min, 15% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Süd (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Konarzewo (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Gajewo Wschód (25 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 7:
Circle K (23 min, 10% → 31%)
-
Stop 8:
VS Express (14 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 9:
Neste (14 min, 10% → 69%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Tesla Model X 2023 Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Q8 Süd (10 min, 24% → 32%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle (41 min, 10% → 76%)
-
Stop 3:
Autohof Bantorf (19 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Euro Rastpark Irxleben/Hohenwarsleben (19 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Tankstelle Friedenstraße (25 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 6:
Biedronka Sycowska (61 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 7:
Hotel Port Kopytkowo (19 min, 10% → 30%)
-
Stop 8:
Ford Gołębiewski (118 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 9:
Rastplatz (43 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 10:
Pulkveža Brieža (22 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 11:
Hesburger (34 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 380-minute advantage over Tesla Model X 2023 on this 2481km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 7min vs 6h 51min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~455 kWh vs ~512 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons