In our Paris to Lyon EV duel, the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 4 minutes, completing the 466km route in 4h 41min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 needs only 1 charging stops compared to 2 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 4 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 4h 41min (4 min faster)
- Charging stops: 1
- Charging time: 20min
- Energy: ~74 kWh
- Distance: 466km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
4h 45min |
4h 41min |
| Charging time: |
22min |
20min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
1 |
| Energy used |
~84 kWh |
~83 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Mobilize Lounge Avia, Créancey (10 min, 12% → 41%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de La Ferté, Saint-Ambreuil (12 min, 15% → 48%)
- Arrival: Lyon
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire du Chien Blanc, Gissey-le-Vieil (20 min, 20% → 72%)
- Arrival: Lyon
Why the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 achieved a 4-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 466km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 1 stops vs 2 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 20min vs 22min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~74 kWh vs ~79 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons