In our Paris to Munich EV duel, the Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 beats the Renault Master Z.E. by 3534 minutes, completing the 827km route in 8h 29min. The key advantage? 11 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on August 31, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 needs only 4 charging stops compared to 15 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170
- Total time: 8h 29min (3534 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 48min
- Energy: ~144 kWh
- Distance: 827km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault Master Z.E. |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 |
| Travel time |
67h 23min |
8h 29min |
| Charging time: |
58h 42min |
48min |
| Charging stops: |
15 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~149 kWh |
~149 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault Master Z.E. Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Aire de Ussy-sur-Marne (231 min, 35% → 86%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Aire de Vrigny (362 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Aire de Valmy Orbeval (263 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Aire de Verdun Saint Nicolas Sud (208 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de Metz Saint-Privat (254 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 6:
Aire de Longeville-lès-Saint-Avold Sud (199 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 7:
Fastned Aire de Keskastel Ouest (313 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 8:
Aire de Brumath Ouest (263 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 9:
Best Western Hotel (63 min, 10% → 24%)
-
Stop 10:
CAP Markt (49 min, 10% → 21%)
-
Stop 11:
Freibad (258 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 12:
Sindelfinger Wald (326 min, 10% → 82%)
-
Stop 13:
Burger King (326 min, 10% → 82%)
-
Stop 14:
Sortimo Innovationspark (358 min, 10% → 89%)
-
Stop 15:
eni Tankstelle Verdistraße (49 min, 10% → 21%)
- Arrival: Munich
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aire de Vrigny (10 min, 60% → 81%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (15 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle Karlsruher Straße (10 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Munich
Why the Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 Won
The Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 achieved a 3534-minute advantage over Renault Master Z.E. on this 827km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 15 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 48min vs 58h 42min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~144 kWh vs ~267 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons