In our Paris to Nice EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance by 6 minutes, completing the 932km route in 9h 4min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 9h 4min (6 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 22min
- Energy: ~152 kWh
- Distance: 932km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
9h 4min |
9h 10min |
| Charging time: |
22min |
30min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~168 kWh |
~168 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de Solaize, Solaize (12 min, 12% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Mercure Beaumanoir, Aix-en-Provence (10 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Nice
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de La Ferté, Saint-Ambreuil (10 min, 25% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de La Coucourde, La Coucourde (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de l'Arc, Rousset (10 min, 16% → 59%)
- Arrival: Nice
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 6-minute advantage over Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance on this 932km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 22min vs 30min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~152 kWh vs ~167 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons