In our Paris to Oslo EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 61 minutes, completing the 1776km route in 19h 36min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 36min (61 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 6min
- Energy: ~326 kWh
- Distance: 1776km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
20h 37min |
19h 36min |
| Charging time: |
2h 2min |
1h 6min |
| Charging stops: |
10 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~320 kWh |
~320 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Bierset (10 min, 15% → 44%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Lütticher Straße Süd (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle Autohof Osnabrück-Hafen (15 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 4:
REWE (15 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 5:
bft Willer (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 6:
Burger King (12 min, 13% → 46%)
-
Stop 7:
Fastned Barbecue barn (11 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 8:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 9:
Supercharger Importgatan (15 min, 12% → 52%)
-
Stop 10:
Shell Svinesundparken (10 min, 10% → 37%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's Debyestraße (11 min, 13% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tankstelle Teutopark (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Ostetal Süd (10 min, 15% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
Clever Erhvervspark (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 16% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Importgatan (15 min, 11% → 70%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 61-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 1776km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 6min vs 2h 2min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~326 kWh vs ~329 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons