In our Oslo to Paris EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 60 minutes, completing the 1770km route in 19h 40min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 40min (60 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 4min
- Energy: ~325 kWh
- Distance: 1770km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
20h 40min |
19h 40min |
| Charging time: |
2h 3min |
1h 4min |
| Charging stops: |
9 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~319 kWh |
~319 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Importgatan (12 min, 32% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Väla Centrum (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Clever Burger King (12 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 4:
OstseeCamp Lübecker Bucht (13 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 5:
KFC (14 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 6:
Tecklenburger Land West (14 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 7:
SWD Ladepark Fährstraße (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Aire de Tignée Nord (16 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 9:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest (18 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Paris
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K Sannarp (13 min, 11% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Erhvervspark (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle Jesteburger Straße (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Tankstelle Teutopark (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
McDonald's Debyestraße (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 60-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 1770km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 4min vs 2h 3min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~325 kWh vs ~328 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons