In our Oslo to Rome EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 85 minutes, completing the 2442km route in 27h 37min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 9 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 27h 37min (85 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 1h 36min
- Energy: ~448 kWh
- Distance: 2442km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
29h 2min |
27h 37min |
| Charging time: |
3h 0min |
1h 36min |
| Charging stops: |
13 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~440 kWh |
~443 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Importgatan (12 min, 32% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Väla Centrum (17 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Væggerløsevej (17 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Wittstock (12 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
McDonald's - Autohof Brück (15 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 6:
mblty ROSI'S Autohof (13 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 7:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (17 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
Aral Tankstelle Garmischer Straße (12 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 9:
Hofer (13 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 10:
Eni Paganella Ovest (11 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 11:
Electra Old Wild West (16 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 12:
Ristorante Goyo (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 13:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest (12 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Rome
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (10 min, 19% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Circle K Tappernøje Vest (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Van der Valk Resort Linstow (11 min, 15% → 63%)
-
Stop 4:
EnBW Kaufland Center (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Aral Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 7:
Shell Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 8:
Electra Old Wild West (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 9:
Osteria De'Giusti (12 min, 10% → 62%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 85-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 2442km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 36min vs 3h 0min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~448 kWh vs ~452 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons