In our Rome to Oslo EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 76 minutes, completing the 2435km route in 27h 38min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 9 charging stops compared to 15 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 27h 38min (76 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 1h 38min
- Energy: ~447 kWh
- Distance: 2435km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
28h 54min |
27h 38min |
| Charging time: |
3h 0min |
1h 38min |
| Charging stops: |
15 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~438 kWh |
~438 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Est (10 min, 13% → 40%)
-
Stop 2:
Povegliano Est (15 min, 12% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
Isarco Est / Eisack Ost (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 5:
Langenbruck A9 (11 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 6:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 7:
Hecht Einrichtungen (11 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 8:
TotalEnergies Autohof (16 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 9:
Supercharger SB Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 10:
HEM Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 11:
Burger King (11 min, 15% → 46%)
-
Stop 12:
Fastned Barbecue barn (11 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 13:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 14:
Supercharger Importgatan (15 min, 12% → 52%)
-
Stop 15:
Shell Svinesundparken (10 min, 10% → 37%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Secchia Est (13 min, 15% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
Smatrics Raststätte Kostner (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Esso Tankstelle Ungererstraße (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (11 min, 17% → 64%)
-
Stop 5:
Burger King Autohof Bitterfeld (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell Recharge Autohof Herzsprung (10 min, 12% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
Burger King (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 23% → 63%)
-
Stop 9:
Supercharger Importgatan (14 min, 15% → 70%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 76-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 2435km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 15 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 38min vs 3h 0min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~447 kWh vs ~451 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons