In our Paris to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 30 minutes, completing the 2081km route in 22h 49min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 49min (30 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 24min
- Energy: ~340 kWh
- Distance: 2081km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
22h 49min |
23h 19min |
| Charging time: |
1h 24min |
1h 49min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~375 kWh |
~375 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aachener Land Süd (10 min, 21% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
EnBW Schnellladepark (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Konarzewo (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Olsze Północ (29 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 6:
VS Express (10 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Riga
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aachener Land Süd (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Autohaus Weber (10 min, 15% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Süd (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Konarzewo (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Gajewo Wschód (25 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 7:
Circle K (23 min, 10% → 31%)
-
Stop 8:
VS Express (10 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 30-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2081km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 24min vs 1h 49min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~340 kWh vs ~382 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons