In our Paris to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the BMW i4 eDrive35 by 123 minutes, completing the 2081km route in 22h 49min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 49min (123 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 24min
- Energy: ~340 kWh
- Distance: 2081km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
BMW i4 eDrive35 |
| Travel time |
22h 49min |
24h 52min |
| Charging time: |
1h 24min |
3h 15min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~375 kWh |
~377 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aachener Land Süd (10 min, 21% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
EnBW Schnellladepark (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Konarzewo (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Olsze Północ (29 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 6:
VS Express (10 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Riga
BMW i4 eDrive35 Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger ibis Styles (10 min, 13% → 51%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle (12 min, 11% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Euro Rastpark (12 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
SB Tank Langer (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Total Autohof (14 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 6:
Autohaus König (15 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 7:
MOP Konarzewo (10 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 8:
Karczma Rzym (12 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 9:
Kaufland (68 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 10:
Circle K (22 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 11:
VS Express (10 min, 10% → 49%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 123-minute advantage over BMW i4 eDrive35 on this 2081km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 24min vs 3h 15min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~340 kWh vs ~364 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons