In our Riga to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the BMW i4 eDrive35 by 114 minutes, completing the 2082km route in 22h 40min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 40min (114 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 18min
- Energy: ~340 kWh
- Distance: 2082km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
BMW i4 eDrive35 |
| Travel time |
22h 40min |
24h 34min |
| Charging time: |
1h 18min |
3h 4min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~375 kWh |
~375 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K (14 min, 57% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Olsze Południe (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell Tankstelle Hämelerwald (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 6:
Remscheid West (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Le Rœulx Nord (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Paris
BMW i4 eDrive35 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K (57 min, 34% → 90%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 24%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Olsze Południe (10 min, 12% → 51%)
-
Stop 4:
Karczma Rzym (10 min, 17% → 54%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 12% → 51%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Walewice (10 min, 19% → 54%)
-
Stop 7:
Circle K Autohof Ferch (12 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Nord (10 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 9:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg (13 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 10:
Ehrenberg West (13 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 11:
IONITY Bierset (12 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 12:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest (17 min, 10% → 66%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 114-minute advantage over BMW i4 eDrive35 on this 2082km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 18min vs 3h 4min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~340 kWh vs ~364 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons