In our Paris to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the BYD Seal U Design by 134 minutes, completing the 2081km route in 22h 49min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 49min (134 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 24min
- Energy: ~340 kWh
- Distance: 2081km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
BYD Seal U Design |
| Travel time |
22h 49min |
25h 3min |
| Charging time: |
1h 24min |
3h 28min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~375 kWh |
~376 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aachener Land Süd (10 min, 21% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
EnBW Schnellladepark (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Konarzewo (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Olsze Północ (29 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 6:
VS Express (10 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Riga
BYD Seal U Design Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Bierset (14 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 2:
OBI (17 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (18 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Irxleben (17 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Autohaus König (17 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Konarzewo (13 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 7:
Karczma Rzym (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 8:
Kaufland (60 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 9:
Circle K (26 min, 10% → 35%)
-
Stop 10:
VS Express (12 min, 10% → 43%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 134-minute advantage over BYD Seal U Design on this 2081km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 24min vs 3h 28min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~340 kWh vs ~453 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons