In our Paris to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 37 minutes, completing the 2084km route in 22h 42min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 42min (37 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 15min
- Energy: ~324 kWh
- Distance: 2084km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
22h 42min |
23h 19min |
| Charging time: |
1h 15min |
1h 49min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~375 kWh |
~375 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OBI (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
SB Tank Langer (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's Genshagen (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Konarzewo (10 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Olsze Północ (25 min, 11% → 84%)
-
Stop 6:
VS Express (10 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Riga
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aachener Land Süd (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Autohaus Weber (10 min, 15% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Süd (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Konarzewo (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Gajewo Wschód (25 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 7:
Circle K (23 min, 10% → 31%)
-
Stop 8:
VS Express (10 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 37-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2084km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 15min vs 1h 49min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~324 kWh vs ~383 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons