In our Riga to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 31 minutes, completing the 2082km route in 22h 32min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 32min (31 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 10min
- Energy: ~324 kWh
- Distance: 2082km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
22h 32min |
23h 3min |
| Charging time: |
1h 10min |
1h 43min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~375 kWh |
~375 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K (10 min, 59% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Olsze Południe (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell Tankstelle Hämelerwald (10 min, 14% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
Remscheid West (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Le Rœulx Nord (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Paris
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Rastplatz (29 min, 64% → 90%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Olsze Południe (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Nord (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg (11 min, 24% → 68%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Aachener Land Nord (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 8:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 31-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2082km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 10min vs 1h 43min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~324 kWh vs ~382 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons