In our Riga to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 29 minutes, completing the 2422km route in 25h 18min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 18min (29 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 22min
- Energy: ~377 kWh
- Distance: 2422km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
25h 18min |
25h 47min |
| Charging time: |
1h 22min |
1h 47min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~436 kWh |
~436 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (10 min, 47% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (13 min, 11% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
P5 Arena Gliwice (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
Hub Ringrast (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Ledra Ovest (16 min, 12% → 74%)
-
Stop 7:
Ristorante Goyo (11 min, 10% → 61%)
- Arrival: Rome
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (21 min, 37% → 83%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Hotel Porto (16 min, 15% → 75%)
-
Stop 4:
Mořice Bistro (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV Tankstelle Sterngasse (10 min, 16% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Ledra Ovest (10 min, 14% → 59%)
-
Stop 8:
Ewiva Parco Commerciale Diamante (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 9:
Area Servizio Badia al Pino Ovest (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 29-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2422km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 22min vs 1h 47min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~377 kWh vs ~445 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons